Peer review declaration
نویسندگان
چکیده
All papers published in this volume of 2127 have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted expert referees to professional and scientific standards expected a proceedings journal IOP Publishing. • Type review : Single-blind Conference submission management system Self-developed web for articles Number submissions received 118 sent 79 accepted 75 Acceptance Rate (Number Submissions Accepted / Received X 100) 64 Average number reviews per paper 1-2 Total reviewers involved 12 Any additional info on process publication conference took place two stages. At first stage, submitting author registered article with annotation information about other authors. The organizing program committee their annotations compliance theme, presence novelty, relevance. After successful check, authors claimed access author’s section. In it, at second stage had upload accompanying documents prepared according JPCS template. Each was one editors design. Parallel this, evaluation (submissions review). marks given following criteria: relevance, possibility putting research into practice, fundamentality research, language level. addition marks, each reviewer give his opinion publishing an proceedings. accepted, made edits fully match camera-ready version form pdf file make possible changes. Contact person queries OMFI-2021 Scientific Secretary: Ph.D., Associate Professor Poroykov A.Yu., [email protected]
منابع مشابه
the impact of peer review on efl reviewers writing proficiency
امروزه تصحیح همکلاسی در کلاسهای نگارش یکی از اجزاء لاینفک کلاسهای دانش آموز محور است. تاثیرات مفید تصحیح همکلاسی بر زبان آموزان، معلمان را متقاعد کرده است که علیرغم صرف زمان، انرژی و توان بسیار، از این شیوه ی آموزشی در کلاسهای آموزش نگارش بهره بگیرند. تحقیق حاضر بر آن است تا با مقایسه دو گروه از یادگیرندگان زبان انگلیسی، تاثیر تصحیح همکلاسی را بر توانایی نوشتاری آنها نشان دهد. 122 خانم زبان آمو...
15 صفحه اولA Review on the Editorial Peer Review
Background and Objectives: The editorial peer review has an important role in the publication of scientific articles. Peers or reviewers are those scholars who have the expertise regarding the topic of a given article. They critically appraise the articles without having any monetary incentives or conflicts of interest. The aim of this study was to determine the most important aspects of the ed...
متن کاملDeclaration of medical writing assistance in international peer-reviewed publications.
not take the place of a standardized logistic regression coefficient for valuating the strength of the influences of the independent variables on the dependent variable, relative to one another.” The strength of each independent variable cannot be judged based on the magnitude of the OR, so that a larger OR for one independent variable might not have a stronger association than a smaller OR for...
متن کاملReviewing Peer Review: a Quantitative Analysis of Peer Review
In this paper we focus on the analysis of peer reviews and reviewers behavior in a number of different review processes. More specifically, we report on the development, definition and rationale of a theoretical model for peer review processes to support the identification of appropriate metrics to assess the processes main properties. We then apply the proposed model and analysis framework to ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Journal of Physics: Conference Series
سال: 2021
ISSN: ['1742-6588', '1742-6596']
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2127/1/011002